BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA042542020 & Ors. [2022] UKAITUR PA042542020 (13 December 2022) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2022/PA042542020.html Cite as: [2022] UKAITUR PA42542020, [2022] UKAITUR PA042542020 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number:
UI-2022-001675 ( PA/04254/2020)
UI-2022-001684 (PA/04255/2020)
UI 2022-001686 ( PA/04257/2020)
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Done at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
On 12 December 2022 |
On 13 December 2022 |
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PERKINS
Between
W U G E
J M R
C S E
Appellant
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
DECISION AND REASONS
1. Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribun al Pro cedure (Upper Tribun al) R ules 2008, th e appellants are granted anon ymity. No-one shall pu blis h or reve al any inf orm ation, including the name or address of th e appellants or any of them, likel y to lead members o f th e public to ide ntify any appellant. F ailu re to com ply with this orde r could amount to a co ntempt of court. I make this order because this is a protection claim and publicity might create a risk that would not otherwise exist.
2. The Appellants were given permission to appeal because it was thought arguable that the First-tier Tribunal Judge, in dismissing their appeals, had not given proper consideration to core documents.
3. In a Rule 24 Reply drawn by Mr Stefan Kotas of the Respondent's Specialist Appeals Team the Respondent agreed that the First-tier Tribunal erred by failing to make a finding on material evidence and invited the Upper Tribunal to remit the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal for a de novo hearing.
4. In the circumstances, and with the consent of the parties I determine this case without a hearing. I find that the First-tier Tribunal erred in law as indicated. I set aside its decision and I direct that the appeal be heard again, de novo, in the First-tier Tribunal by a different judge.
Notice of Decision
5. The First-tier Tribunal erred in law.
6. I set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal.
7. I direct that the appeal be heard again, de novo, in the First-tier Tribunal by a different judge.
8. The hearing listed at Field House on 13 December 2022 is vacated.
Jonathan Perkins
Signed |
|
Jonathan Perkins |
|
Judge of the Upper Tribunal |
Dated 12 December 2022 |