BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA062972021 [2023] UKAITUR IA062972021 (4 April 2023) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2023/IA062972021.html Cite as: [2023] UKAITUR IA62972021, [2023] UKAITUR IA062972021 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
A picture containing text
Description automatically generated
|
IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER |
Case No: UI-2021-001933 First-tier Tribunal No: PA/51027/2021; IA/06297/2021 |
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
On the 04 April 2023
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SHERIDAN
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BOWLER
Between
H S K
(ANONYMITY DIRECTIOn confirmed)
Appellant
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation
For the Appellant: Ms K Wass, Counsel instructed by Quality Solicitors A-Z Law
For the Respondent: Mr S Walker, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
Heard at Field House on 24 March 2023
CONSENT ORDER
Background
1. The Appellant appeals against a decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Beg ("the judge") dated 22 April 2022 dismissing his protection and human rights appeal.
2. At the error of law hearing Mr Walker provided a Rule 24 response which was dated 22 June 2022, but which had not been received by the Tribunal or the Appellant. In that the Respondent conceded that the application for permission to appeal would not be opposed and invited the Tribunal to set aside the judge's decision. Mr Walker and Ms Wass agreed that the appeal should be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be decided afresh by a judge other than Judge Beg with no findings preserved.
3. The parties agreed to dispose of the proceedings by way of a consent order.
Decision
4. Pursuant to Rules 39 and 40(3) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 we make the following order:
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside and the appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be decided afresh by a judge other than Judge Beg with no findings preserved.
|
Signed
T. Bowler
|
|
|
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Bowler |
Dated: 24 March 2022 |
