BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> UI2022006226 & Ors [2023] UKAITUR UI2022006226 (8 June 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2023/UI2022006226.html
Cite as: [2023] UKAITUR UI2022006226

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL

IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER

Case No: UI- 2022-006226

UI-2022-006227

UI-2022-006228

UI-2022-006229

 

First-tier Tribunal Nos:

HU/57159/2021- LH/00389/2022

HU/57165/2021- LH/00393/2022

HU/57161/2021- LH/00392/2022

HU/57163/ 2021- LH/00390/2022

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

Decision & Reasons Issued:

On the 08 June 2023

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RINTOUL

 

Between

 

RANGINA QADRI

NAZOO QADRI

MURTAZA QADRI

ZOHIBULLAH QADRI

(NO ANONYMITY ORDER MADE)

Appellant

 

and

 

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

 

Respondent

 

Representation :

For the Appellant: Mr Ellis Wilford, instructed by Lawrence & Co Solicitors

For the Respondent: Mr D Clarke, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

Heard at Field House on 7 June 2023

­

 

DECISION MADE PURSUANT TO RULES 34, 39 & 40 (3) OF THE

TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE (UPPER TRIBUNAL) RULES 2008

 

  1. The appellants appeal with permission against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal promulgated on 11 October 2022.

 

 

  1. In the light of the submissions by both parties, and the effective agreement by the respondent that the judge erred in failing properly to apply the test of fairness to the application to adjourn, the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error of law for the reasons set out in grounds 1 and 2.

 

  1. As the hearing was unfair, it follows that none of the findings of fact can be preserved, the appeal will have to be heard again and accordingly it is appropriate to remit it to the First-tier Tribunal.

 

  1. Rule 40 (1) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 provided that the Upper Tribunal may give a decision orally at a hearing which I did. Rule 40 (3) provides that the Upper Tribunal must provide written reasons for its decision with a decision notice unless the parties have consented to the Upper Tribunal not giving written reasons. I am satisfied that the parties have given such consent at the hearing.

 

Notice of Decision

 

1.       The decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error of law and is set aside.

 

2.       I remit the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh hearing on all issues.

Signed Date: 7 June 2023

Jeremy K H Rintoul

Judge of the Upper Tribunal

Immigration and Asylum Chamber

 

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2023/UI2022006226.html