BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> UI2024000308 [2024] UKAITUR UI2024000308 (11 March 2024) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2024/UI2024000308.html Cite as: [2024] UKAITUR UI2024000308 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER |
Case No: UI-2024-000308 |
|
First-tier Tribunal No: HU/51705/2023 |
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Decision & Reasons Issued:
11 th March 2024
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PERKINS
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE G A BLACK
Between
Muhammad Tareef Faisal
(no anonymity order made)
Appellant
and
The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Mr Z Nasim, Counsel instructed by Direct Public Access
For the Respondent: Mrs A Nolan, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
Heard at Field House on 6 March 2023
DECISION AND REASONS
1. This is an appeal against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal dismissing the Appellant's appeal against a decision of the Respondent on 23 January 2023 refusing him leave to remain in the United Kingdom.
2. The Appellant not attend the hearing and the appeal was dismissed.
3. His grounds rely in part on his having been involved in a road traffic accident some three weeks or so before the hearing but this serves mainly to cloud the issue. His best point is that he did not know about the hearing.
4. Mr Nasim has prepared a very fully supplementary bundle which Mrs Nolan has been able to consider.
5. There is no proper basis for doubting the Appellant's claim that he was not notified of the hearing of his appeal.
6. In the circumstances we find that there has been a procedural irregularity amounting to an error of law. We set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal and direct that the appeal be heard again in the First-tier Tribunal.
Notice of Decision
7. The First-tier Tribunal erred in law. We set aide this decision and direct that the case be heard again in the First-tier Tribunal.
Jonathan Perkins
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Immigration and Asylum Chamber
6 March 2024