BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> UI2024001419 [2024] UKAITUR UI2024001419 (6 June 2024) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2024/UI2024001419.html Cite as: [2024] UKAITUR UI2024001419 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER |
Case No: UI-2024 -001419 First-tier Tribunal Nos: PA/54888/2021 IA/14805/2021 |
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Decision & Reasons Issued:
On the 06 June 2024
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PERKINS
Between
F A
(ANONYMITY ORDER MADE)
Appellant
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Determined at Field House without a hearing on 5 June 2024
Pursuant to rule 34 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008
DECISION AND REASONS
1. This is an appeal against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal dismissing an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the Secretary of State refusing him international protection and leave to remain on human rights grounds.
2. Permission to appeal was granted by the First-tier Tribunal because it was arguable that the judge had not taken into account material considerations concerning the appellant's sexuality and perceived political opinion, and the judge had not given proper reasons for his findings and, generally, had not shown sufficient care.
3. In a Rule 24 Notice dated 10 April 2024 the respondent indicated that he did not oppose the appeal and invited the tribunal to remit the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal for rehearing.
4. I think that this will be the second time that the appeal has been remitted. Nevertheless the appellant's solicitors have indicated their consent to such a disposal. There is no sensible basis on which findings on controversial matters can be preserved. The appeal has to be re determined and the appellant is entitled to preserve all his appeal rights.
Notice of Decision
5. The First-tier Tribunal erred in law. I set aide this decision and direct the case be heard again in the First-tier Tribunal.
Jonathan Perkins
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Immigration and Asylum Chamber
5 June 2024