BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> UI2024001594 & UI2024001595 [2024] UKAITUR UI2024001594 (15 November 2024) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2024/UI2024001594.html Cite as: [2024] UKAITUR UI2024001594 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
|
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER |
Case No: UI-2024-001594 UI-2024-001595 |
|
|
First-tier Tribunal No: HU/61365/2023 HU/61366/2023 |
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Decision & Reasons Issued:
On 15 th of November 2024
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DANIEL SHERIDAN
Between
Erik Kondratskyi
Ionna Kipen
Appellants
And
Entry Clearance Officer
Respondent
DECISION MADE WIHTOUT A HEARING PURSUANT TO RULE 34 OF THE Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008
BackgrounD
1. The appellants have been granted permission to challenge a decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Haria.
2. On 11 October 2024 the respondent filed a Rule 24 response, stating the following:
1. The respondent to this appeal is the Secretary of State for the Home Department. Documents relating to this appeal should be sent to the Secretary of State for the Home Department, at the above email address.
2. The respondent does not oppose the appellant's application for permission to appeal and invites the Tribunal to remit the matter to the First-tier Tribunal with jurisdiction to hear the appeals.
In the interim, the Entry Clearance Officer has indicated that the applications will be reconsidered after liaising with the applicants. Once any further representations are received by the ECO, it is anticipated that a consideration will be made within 28 days
3. In the light of the Rule 24 response, I am satisfied that it is in accordance with the overriding objective to make a decision without a hearing in the following terms, which reflects the outcome sought by both parties.
DECISION
4. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside and the appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be made afresh by a different judge.
D. Sheridan
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Immigration and Asylum Chamber
12.11.2024
