BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Lakareber v University Of Portsmouth [1998] UKEAT 791_98_0106 (1 June 1998) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1998/791_98_0106.html Cite as: [1998] UKEAT 791_98_0106, [1998] UKEAT 791_98_106 |
||
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
| At the Tribunal | |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK
MR R SANDERSON OBE
MR J C SHRIGLEY
| APPELLANT | |
| RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
INTERLOCUTORY HEARING
| For the Appellant | NO APPEARANCE BY OR REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT / RESPONDENTS |
| For the Respondents |
JUDGE PETER CLARK: This is an ex parte Preliminary Hearing held to determine whether this appeal raises any arguable point or points of law to go to a full appeal hearing. The Appellant has asked that the appeal be determined on paper.
We have considered the papers. The two decisions or orders of the Industrial Tribunal against which this appeal is brought by the Applicant, Ms Lakareber, who complains of unlawful racial discrimination against the Respondent University, are as follows:
(1) An order by the London (North) Industrial Tribunal dated 4 June 1998 that the case be transferred to the Southampton Industrial Tribunal office, and
(2) A direction by the Southampton Industrial Tribunal, by a notice of hearing dated 12 June 1998, that the case be listed for a Pre-Hearing Review on 10 July 1998. That hearing has been adjourned pending the outcome of this appeal.
Our difficulty in forming any view about the merits of the appeal lies in this basic factual question. By the order of the London (North) Industrial Tribunal it is said:
"On the direction of a chairman of the Tribunals and with the agreement of both parties, the above application has been transferred to the Southampton Tribunals Office for hearing."
One of the points raised by the Appellant in her Notice of Appeal is that she did not agree to the transfer. On the contrary, she says that Southampton is most inconvenient to her, living as she does in London. Did she agree or not?
We direct that the relevant papers be sent to the London (North) Regional Chairman for her comments as to the basis on which the unidentified Chairman made the direction "with the agreement of both parties". How was that agreement signified?
Upon receipt of the Regional Chairman's comments I shall give further directions for the disposal of this matter. Meanwhile this appeal is adjourned.
