BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> South West Logistics v. Collings [1999] UKEAT 333_99_2907 (29 July 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/333_99_2907.html
Cite as: [1999] UKEAT 333_99_2907

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1999] UKEAT 333_99_2907
Appeal No. EAT/333/99

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 29 July 1999

Before

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHARLES

LORD GLADWIN OF CLEE CBE JP

MISS D WHITTINGHAM



SOUTH WEST LOGISTICS APPELLANT

MISS L A COLLINGS RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 1999


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellants NO APPEARANCE OR
    REPRESENTATION
    BY OR ON BEHALF OF
    THE APPELLANTS
       


     

    MR JUSTICE CHARLES: This matter comes before us by way of preliminary hearing for the second time. The last time it was before me, and other members of this Tribunal, it was adjourned to enable Mr Wigg to attend and I made directions that he should send information to this Tribunal.

  1. As a result of that Mr Wigg has sent information to the Tribunal and has written inviting us to deal with the case on paper, saying that it is difficult for him to come here.
  2. What we have decided to do, after some consideration, is to adjourn this matter so that it can come on again as a preliminary hearing. We have done that because simply from a reading of the papers we do not feel that we have a full or clear picture. We remain somewhat confused as to precisely what Mr Wigg is saying.
  3. We therefore consider it appropriate to give him an opportunity and, it seems to us, a last opportunity, to come and explain his case to this Tribunal and thereby fill in the gaps in the correspondence and documents.
  4. We would also urge him to consider carefully whether he should take advantage of the ELAAS (Employment Law Appeal Advice Scheme) which is run by the Bar in respect of preliminary hearings in this Tribunal whereby members of the Bar provide assistance free of charge to Appellants in identifying reasonably arguable points of law in respect of appeals.
  5. We repeat, we would urge Mr Wigg to take advantage of that scheme and we will adjourn this case to be fixed for a further preliminary hearing next term.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/333_99_2907.html