BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Williamson v. St George's Healthcare NHS Trust [2000] EAT 1322_99_0302 (3 February 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/1322_99_0302.html
Cite as: [2000] EAT 1322_99_302, [2000] EAT 1322_99_0302

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2000] EAT 1322_99_0302
Appeal No. EAT/1322/99

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 3 February 2000

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE H WILSON

MR D A C LAMBERT

MRS J M MATTHIAS



MRS D S WILLIAMSON APPELLANT

ST GEORGE'S HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2000


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR W PANTON
    (of Counsel)
    Messrs Ceres & Co
    Solicitors
    8 Arlington Parade
    Brixton Hill
    London SW2 1RH
       


     

    JUDGE H WILSON: This preliminary hearing of the Appellant's proposed appeal against the decision of the Employment Tribunal that her complaints should fail has been presented by Mr Panton on her behalf, who represented her before the Employment Tribunal.

  1. The Applicant complains that she was the victim of racial discrimination and was unfairly selected for dismissal on the grounds of redundancy. The Respondent said that her post became redundant when an Intensive Care Unit was closed for a second time in March 1998. They said that there were no suitable alternative posts available and therefore the Applicant became redundant. Her appeal against that finding had been withdrawn.
  2. We have had put before us by Mr Panton this morning a policy statement on implementing change, redeployment, re-training and redundancy. In a sentence, his case is that the Applicant should have been dealt with under the terms of that policy and not on the basis upon which she was dealt with.
  3. We are satisfied that this matter should go forward for full argument on the question whether the Applicant should have been treated as a long-serving member of staff and therefore susceptible to the redundancy policy and, if so, whether the failure by the Respondent, the Trust, to do so was because of racial reasons.
  4. On that limited ground, we think the matter should go forward categorised as 'C' with a time estimate of one hour.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/1322_99_0302.html