BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Williams v. Y K K (UK) Ltd [2002] UKEAT 0408_01_2202 (22 February 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/0408_01_2202.html
Cite as: [2002] UKEAT 408_1_2202, [2002] UKEAT 0408_01_2202

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2002] UKEAT 0408_01_2202
Appeal No. EAT/0408/01

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 22 February 2002

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE A WILKIE QC

MR T C THOMAS CBE

MR N D WILLIS



MISS A WILLIAMS APPELLANT

Y K K (UK) LIMITED RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING EX PARTE

© Copyright 2002


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant NO APPEARANCE OR
    REPRESENTATION
    BY OR ON BEHALF OF
    THE APPELLANT
       


     

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE A WILKIE QC

  1. This is the Preliminary Hearing of an appeal by Miss Angela Williams against the decision of the Employment Tribunal sitting at Liverpool on 23 January 2001 which dismissed her complaint of unlawful disability discrimination by reason of her dismissal by Y K K (UK) LIMITED. Miss Williams has submitted a detailed Notice of Appeal which raises a number of issues which may or may not after proper argument result in the case being permitted to go through to a Full Hearing.
  2. Unfortunately, Miss Williams, who lives apparently in Liverpool, has not attended the Tribunal this morning at the time when the case has come on hearing. There has been no communication from her to indicate that she was not attending this morning. As a matter of routine the papers in the case were passed to Mr Horan of counsel under the ELAAS Scheme but he has very properly indicated to us that as he has had no communication with her he is not empowered under the ELAAS Scheme to address us.
  3. In these somewhat troubling circumstances it seems to us that the correct course is for us to adjourn this case for a period of 21 days in order to enable Mr Horan to attempt to make contact with Miss Williams to see whether she wishes to avail herself of his services under the ELAAS Scheme and, if so, on the next occasion for him, or someone else under the ELAAS Scheme, to represent her, or alternatively to make it clear to her that if she does not attend on the next occasion and does not avail herself of the ELAAS Scheme then the Tribunal will consider her appeal on the basis of the paperwork that is then before the Tribunal.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/0408_01_2202.html