BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Sylvester v. Woolacombe Bay Holiday Parcs [2002] UKEAT 591_00_2908 (29 August 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/591_00_2908.html
Cite as: [2002] UKEAT 591__2908, [2002] UKEAT 591_00_2908

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2002] UKEAT 591_00_2908
Appeal No. EAT/591/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 29 August 2002

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE D SEROTA QC

MR B V FITZGERALD MBE

MR S M SPRINGER MBE



MR D SYLVESTER APPELLANT

WOOLACOMBE BAY HOLIDAY PARCS RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2002


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR CYRIL ADJEI
    (of Counsel)
    Instructed By:
    Messrs Nash & Co
    Solicitors
    Beaumont House
    Beaumont Park
    Plymouth
    Devon PL4 9BD
       


     

    JUDGE D SEROTA QC:

  1. Mr Adjei, our provisional view is that your application to amend the Notice of Appeal is really far too late. It is over two years late and there is no explanation given as to why it was not raised at an earlier stage.
  2. In those circumstances our provisional view would have been to disallow that amendment. However, as we have come to the conclusion that the crucial issue in the case is going to be determined by the House of Lords in February 2003 and we have already agreed that it is appropriate that the preliminary hearing of the appeal should be stayed until 15 March 2003.
  3. It seems to us best and most appropriate that the decision as to whether the amendment you seek to make should be considered after the House of Lords has determined the Secretary of State for Defence v MacDonald case and, possibly, Pearce v Mayfield Secondary School as well, if that is conjoined. We understand that these decisions are likely to have been determined by 15 March 2003. If the decisions are still outstanding the EAT will consider what steps to take on 15 March 2003.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/591_00_2908.html