BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) >> Swift Advances plc v Norma Hortense Beharie (Charges and charging orders : Construction) [2019] UKFTT 248 (PC) (20 March 2019) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2019/2017_0052.html Cite as: [2019] UKFTT 248 (PC) |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Swift Advances plc v Norma Hortense Beharie (Charges and charging orders : Construction) [2019] UKFTT 248 (PC) (20 March 2019)
[2019] UKFTT 248 (PC). The terms of a legal charge of Blackacre given by Respondent to Applicant included a condition that Respondent agreed to give Applicant a legal charge over any legal interest in any property Respondent may have then. As at the date of the legal charge, Respondent was the registered proprietor of Whiteacre which was her home. Respondent applied to cancel an agreed notice entered by Applicant over Whiteacre on the basis that there was no agreement to charge or if there was it was unenforceable under consumer credit legislation, unfair contract terms and Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. These points all failed. Held that on the true construction of the legal charge of Blackacre, it took effect as an enforceable agreement to charge Whiteacre.
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2019] UKFTT 248 (PC).pdf
