BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) >> Crix v Main (Beneficial interests, trusts and restrictions : Beneficial interests, trusts and restrictions) [2019] UKFTT 505 (PC) (18 July 2019) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2019/505.html Cite as: [2019] UKFTT 505 (PC) |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
| Case reference | REF/2018/0307 |
|---|---|
| Date of decision | 18/07/2019 |
| Adjudicator | Mr Gary Cowen |
| Applicant | (1) Peter Roy Crix (2) Matthew David Boast |
| Respondent | Robert Ian Main |
| Main Category & Sub Category | |
| Category | Beneficial interests, trusts and restrictions |
| Sub Category | Express agreement |
| Secondary Category & Sub Category | |
| Category | Beneficial interests, trusts and restrictions |
| Sub Category | Express agreement |
| Decision notes | [2019] UKFTT 505 (PC). The administrators of the estate of a Mr Farmer applied to enter restrictions on title to three properties in the name of the Respondent. It appears that Mr Farmer, a former solicitor with a criminal conviction, had acquired over 80 properties by the time of his death. The Respondent accepted in his Statement of Case that Mr Farmer had some beneficial interest in the properties so restrictions could have been entered without more. However, the Applicants asserted the Respondent was a bare trustee for the estate and sought a finding to that effect. Held on the facts that the Respondent was a bare trustee for the estate. The established facts were not such as to make it just to deny the Applicants relief under Patel v. Mirza. |
| Download decision(s) | [2019] UKFTT 505 (PC) |
