First-tier Tribunal (Tax)

[2014] UKFTT 034 (TC)

TC03175

 

 

 

Appeal number: TC/2013/06297

 

COMPANY TAX RETURNS – LATE LODGING – LACK OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN ACCOUNTANT AND DIRECTOR – VOLUNTARY ACCOUNTANCY SERVICES – WHETHER REASONABLE EXCUSE - NO – APPEAL DISMISSED

 

 

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL

TAX CHAMBER

 

 

	TEESDALE WEST DURHAM CIC	Appellants
	- and -
	THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY’S	Respondents
	REVENUE & CUSTOMS

 

 

 

TRIBUNAL:	JUDGE  N A BAIRD

 

 

 

The Tribunal determined the appeal on 6 December 2013 without a hearing under the provisions of Rule 26 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (default paper cases) having first read the Notice of Appeal dated 4 September 2013 (with enclosures), and HMRC’s Statement of Case submitted on 15 October 2013 (with enclosures).

 

 

 

 

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013

DECISION

 

 

1 The appellants  appeal against the decision of HMRC to impose a penalty of £100  in terms of Paragraph 17 of Schedule 18 to the Finance Act 1998 for late lodging of their Company Tax return due to be filed by 31 March 2013.  It was filed online on 10 May 2013.  

 

2. It is submitted in the grounds of appeal by a Director of the appellant company that the Penalty Notice dated 17 April 2013 alerted him to the fact that the return had not been filed. On  speaking to his accountant he realised there had been a misunderstanding.  The accountant had not filed the return, saying   ‘he did not recall being given a date’. The Director says that the company,  being a non-profit community interest company,  relies on voluntary accountancy services.  He had failed to make it clear that the return had to be done and the accountant thought the Director had already done it.  

 

 3. The position of HMRC is that the account  relied on by the appellants does not constitutes a reasonable excuse. They say  that a great deal of information about returns is available online, the onus is on the company to ensure that a return is submitted on time and a company is expected to arrange its affairs to ensure that there is compliance with  its obligations under the tax legislation.  They conclude that the appellants have not established that on a balance of probabilities there is a reasonable excuse for their failure to file the return on time.

 

4. . If a person is to rely on reasonable excuse, this must have existed for the whole of the period of default. A reasonable excuse is normally an unexpected or unusual event, either unforeseeable or beyond the person’s control, which prevents him from complying with an obligation when he otherwise would have done. The matter has to be considered in the light of the actions of a reasonable prudent tax payer exercising foresight and due diligence and having proper regard for his responsibilities under the Taxes Act.  

 

5. The return was not filed on time so the penalty  was properly charged. The company had a responsibility to ensure that the return was filed and failed to do so. There was clearly a lack of communication but the filing of the return was an important obligation and such lack of communication does not in my view constitute reasonable  excuse.

 

6. I dismiss the appeal.

 

7.This document contains full findings of fact and reasons for the decision. Any party dissatisfied with this decision has a right to apply for permission to appeal against it pursuant to Rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009. The application must be received by this Tribunal not later than 56 days after this decision is sent to that party.  The parties are referred to “Guidance to accompany a Decision from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)” which accompanies and forms part of this decision notice.

 

 

 

N A BAIRD

TRIBUNAL JUDGE

 

RELEASE DATE 23 December 2013