BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom House of Lords Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom House of Lords Decisions >> Robert Bruce of Symbster, Esq. v. Wm. Ogilvie, Merchant [1813] UKHL 5_Paton_706 (31 June 1813) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1813/5_Paton_706.html Cite as: [1813] UKHL 5_Paton_706 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Page: 706↓
(1813) 5 Paton 706
CASES DECIDED IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS, UPON APPEAL FROM THE COURTS OF SCOTLAND, FROM 1753 TO 1813.
No. 76
(Dow's Rep. vol. i. p. 39.)
House of Lords,
Subject_Partnership — Liability — Compensation.
The appellant was steward and factor to his uncle, John Bruce Stewart of Symbster, and he at sametime carried on some trade at Bigton in Shetland.
The respondent was engaged by him to assist him both in his stewardship and the trade. He was to have £10 a year, and his board for his assistance in the former capacity, and was to have one-third of the profits of the trade, (he bearing a share of the loss in the same proportion) in the business of the trade.
The respondent managed the whole business of the latter partnership. At the termination of that partnership he brought the present action for £37. 17s. 3d., due him of wages, as assistant factor, and £63.19s. due him on the partnership transactions. In defence, the appellant stated that the accounts, by which he brought out the balance on the partnership accounts, omitted to take into account a loss on tallow, bought by the respondent, which turned out so unfortunate a speculation, that a loss arose of no less than £330, all of which was paid by the appellant, so that when the pursuer debits himself with the third of this loss, instead of anything being due to him, the balance is against him: Held the appellant liable, and repelled his defences. Reversed in the House of Lords, and remit made to allow both parties a proof of the facts contained in their condescendence and answers respectively.
Counsel: For the Appellant,
Geo. Cranstoun,
Fra. Horner.
For the Respondent,
Wm. Alexander,
Robt. Corbet.