University of Plymouth (Decision Notice) [2010] UKICO FS50245527 (15 February 2010)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> University of Plymouth (Decision Notice) [2010] UKICO FS50245527 (15 February 2010)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2010/FS50245527.html
Cite as: [2010] UKICO FS50245527

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


University of Plymouth (Decision Notice) [2010] UKICO FS50245527 (15 February 2010)

Summary: The complainant made two requests under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the -Act-) to the University of Plymouth (the -University-). The first request was for copies of [named employee-s] correspondence relating to the Climate Wars TV programme, including, but not restricted to, correspondence with two named individuals. The second request was for confirmation as to whether a [named employee] was on unpaid leave of absence during the filming of this programme. The University stated that it did not hold information relating to the first request under section 1(1)(a) of the Act. It explained that the [named employee-s] involvement in the programme was in a purely personal capacity and not as an -employee- of the University. The Commissioner considers that the University does not hold information relevant to the first request under section 1(1)(a) of the Act as under section 3(2)(a) the information is only held on behalf of another person. In relation to the second request, the University refused to provide this information as it stated that it was exempt under section 40(2). The Commissioner considers that section 40(2) was correctly engaged in this case. The Commissioner does however consider that the University breached section 1(1)(a), section 10(1) and section 17(1)(b) and (c) in its handling of the requests.
Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 3 - Complaint Not upheld, FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld

A HTML version of this file is not available click here to view the whole pdf version : [2010] UKICO FS50245527


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2010/FS50245527.html