BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Information Commissioner's Office |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Dyfed Powys Police (Decision Notice) [2012] UKICO FS50461619 (18 December 2012) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2012/FS50461619.html Cite as: [2012] UKICO FS50461619 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Summary: The complainant asked how and why given the Code of Conduct in place at the time, a serving Dyfed-Powys Police Officer could allegedly be found to be trespassing into his home, and allegedly conspiring in a theft of his personal belongings. He also wanted to know under what authority a named DPP employee had issued instructions to a police constable to allegedly break the law. Dyfed Powys Police (DPP) refused to either confirm or deny whether it held any relevant information citing section 30(3), section 40(5)(a) and 40(5)(b)(i) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The Commissioner-™s decision is that DPP has correctly relied on section 30(3) and section 40(5)(a) of the Act. The Commissioner orders no steps.
Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 30 - Complaint Not upheld, FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld
