BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Information Commissioner's Office |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Thanet District Council (Decision Notice) [2013] UKICO FS50485296 (15 July 2013) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2013/FS50485296.html Cite as: [2013] UKICO FS50485296 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Summary: The complainant has requested communications between Thanet District Council Officials, including Councillors and Mary Portas and/or her PR firm, Yellow Door. Thanet District Council (the -Council-) initially asserted that it held information within the scope of this request but needed further time to consider the public interest in disclosure. The Council changed this position at internal review. It then asserted that it did not hold the requested information. The Commissioner-s decision is that, on the balance of probabilities, the Council does not hold the requested information and that it provided adequate advice and assistance to the complainant. However, it failed to tell the complainant that it did not hold the requested information within 20 working days of receiving the request. In doing so, it contravened the requirements of section 10(1) of the Act.
Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 16 - Complaint Not upheld
