Surrey Police (Police and criminal justice) [2021] UKICO IC-42620 (12 January 2021)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Surrey Police (Police and criminal justice) [2021] UKICO IC-42620 (12 January 2021)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2021/ic-42620.html
Cite as: [2021] UKICO IC-42620

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Surrey Police

The complainant requested information relating to mobile phone extraction technology. Surrey Police ultimately refused to confirm or deny holding the requested information. The Commissioner’s decision is that Surrey Police failed to issue, within 20 working days, a refusal notice specifying the exemptions on which it eventually came to rely. She therefore finds that Surrey Police breached section 17 of the FOIA in responding to the request. The Commissioner requires no steps to be taken as a result of this decision.

FOI 17: Complaint upheld

Decision notice: IC-42620

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2021/ic-42620.html