Durham Constabulary (Police and criminal justice) [2022] UKICO 170199 (10 November 2022)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Durham Constabulary (Police and criminal justice) [2022] UKICO 170199 (10 November 2022)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2022/170199.html
Cite as: [2022] UKICO 170199

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Durham Constabulary

The complainant has requested information about a specific criminal investigation which he believed was poorly handled. Durham Constabulary (‘the Constabulary’) would neither confirm nor deny (‘NCND’) holding the requested information, citing the exemption at sections 40(5A) and (5B)(a)(i) (Personal information) of FOIA. It also argued that the NCND provisions at section 31(3) (Law enforcement) and section 38(2) (Health and safety) of FOIA applied. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Constabulary was entitled to rely on sections 40(5A) and (5B)(a)(i) to issue an NCND response to the request. However, by failing to issue a refusal notice explaining this within 20 working days of receipt of the request, the Constabulary breached section 17(1) of FOIA. The Commissioner requires no steps as a result of this decision. Keywords: Evidence, IOPC

FOI 17: Complaint upheld FOI 40: Complaint not upheld

Decision notice: 170199

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2022/170199.html