BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> IMPOTA/IMPOTA PLUS (Trade Mark: Opposition) [1999] UKIntelP o34599 (8 October 1999) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/1999/o34599.html Cite as: [1999] UKIntelP o34599 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o34599
Result
Sections 3(3)(a) - Not pursued.
Section 3(6) - Opposition failed.
Section 5(4)(a) - In light of decision under Section 3(6) opposition on this ground failed.
Points Of Interest
Summary
Essential ground of opposition under Section 3(6). Both sides filed evidence but it was only of limited assistance in that it raised as many questions as it answered. Objection under Section 3(6) is a serious matter and places an onus of proof on the party making the allegation. In this case the Hearing Officer concluded that the opponents had not established a case of bad faith and therefore the opposition failed on this ground.
