BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> BETTY'S KITCHEN CORONATION STREET (Trade Mark: Opposition) [1999] UKIntelP o36099 (14 October 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/1999/o36099.html
Cite as: [1999] UKIntelP o36099

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


BETTY'S KITCHEN CORONATION STREET (Trade Mark: Opposition) [1999] UKIntelP o36099 (14 October 1999)

For the whole decision click here: o36099

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/360/99
Decision date
14 October 1999
Hearing officer
Mr M Reynolds
Mark
BETTY'S KITCHEN CORONATION STREET
Classes
29, 30
Applicants
Granada Television Ltd
Opponents
Bettys & Taylors Group Ltd
Opposition
Sections 5(2), 5(3), 5(4)(a) and 3(6)

Result

Section 5(2)(b) - Opposition succeeded. The respective marks held to be confusingly similar.

Section 5(3) - Not considered in view of finding under Section 5(2)(b).

Section 5(4)(a) - Not considered in view of finding under Section 5(2)(b).

Section 3(6) - Opposition succeeded.

Points Of Interest

Summary

Opponents opposition based on ownership and use of a number of registered BETTY'S marks in respect of a range of food products. Extensive evidence filed by both parties. Opponents’ use of long standing but tended to be more local than national. However, some national advertising and also sales via a "BETTY'S by POST" business. Applicants claimed some use of their mark but such use was in a different style from that applied for. In use the elements BETTY’S KITCHEN and CORONATION STREET were separated and not presented as a composite mark.

Applicants had previously attempted to register the mark BETTY'S KITCHEN but had withdrawn that mark because of the opponents' objections. The opponents claimed the present application was made in bad faith (Section 3(6)) since the opponents did not intend to use the mark in the form applied for. Opposition successful under both Sections 5(2) and Section 3(6).



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/1999/o36099.html