BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> FACCHINO (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o17300 (16 May 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2000/o17300.html
Cite as: [2000] UKIntelP o17300

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


FACCHINO (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2000] UKIntelP o17300 (16 May 2000)

For the whole decision click here: o17300

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/173/00
Decision date
16 May 2000
Hearing officer
Mr M Knight
Mark
FACCHINO
Classes
18
Applicant for Declaration of Invalidity
Purseworld Leathergoods Limited
Registered Proprietor
APT International Limited
Invalidity
Section 47(2) and Section 5(4)(a)

Result

Section 47(2) and Section 5(4)(a) - Application for Invalidity successful.

Points Of Interest

Summary

The applicants for Invalidity claimed to have adopted the trade mark FACCHINO/FACCINO in October 1992 and to have sold leather goods to Salisburys, who had a nationwide chain of stores at that time, from November1993 onwards. The registered proprietor claimed modest user of the mark FACCHINO from 1994 though some of the material provided was undated.

Under Section 5(4)(a) the Hearing Officer concluded that the applicants had established user from November 1993 and, by the time the registered proprietors first commenced to use their mark in early 1994, they had achieved considerable sales through the Salisburys chain of stores and thus established a goodwill and reputation. As the marks are identical or very close and the goods at issue are identical the Hearing Officer was of the view that confusion and actual damage to the applicants goodwill would be caused if the registered proprietors used their mark.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2000/o17300.html