BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Serge Jean -Marie Rebeillard and Cecile Denise Kreweras (Patent) [2003] UKIntelP o27603 (10 September 2003)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o27603.html
Cite as: [2003] UKIntelP o27603

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Serge Jean-Marie Rebeillard and Cecile Denise Kreweras [2003] UKIntelP o27603 (10 September 2003)

For the whole decision click here: o27603

Patent decision

BL number
O/276/03
Concerning rights in
EP(UK)0322268
Hearing Officer
Mr M C Wright
Decision date
10 September 2003
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Serge Jean-Marie Rebeillard and Cecile Denise Kreweras
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977, Section 28(3)
Keywords
Restoration
Related Decisions
None

Summary

Mrs Kreweras, who took over responsibility for renewals when her husband fell ill, received reminders from her patent attorney informing her that the last day for paying the renewal fee with extension fees was 2 June 2002. However, she says she did not notice that the date was different from the date quoted in the reminders for paying renewal fees on corresponding patents in other countries, which was 30 June 2002. Consequently, when she issued instructions later in June 2002 to pay the fee it was too late. The Hearing Officer found that the reminders were unequivocal and contained a clear indication of their importance. He appreciated that Mrs Kreweras was under some pressure at the time. However, in the absence of any explanation for her failure to notice the date, he was not satisfied that that pressure was such as to impair her ability to act in a reasonable manner such as to excuse her failure to issue payment instruction in time. He therefore refused to allow restoration.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o27603.html