BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Thomas Swan Company Limited v English Hop Products Limited (Patent) [2004] UKIntelP o14604 (25 May 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o14604.html
Cite as: [2004] UKIntelP o14604

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Thomas Swan Company Limited v English Hop Products Limited [2004] UKIntelP o14604 (25 May 2004)

For the whole decision click here: o14604

Patent decision

BL number
O/146/04
Concerning rights in
GB2336363
Hearing Officer
Mr S N Dennehey
Decision date
25 May 2004
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Thomas Swan & Company Limited v English Hop Products Limited
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 S. 72 (1)
Keywords
Inventive step, Revocation
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The patent related to a process for the hydrogenation of hop acids used in beer making which involved carrying out the process in supercritical carbon dioxide over a noble metal catalyst. Thomas Swan contended that the patent should be revoked for lack of inventive step on the basis of a single prior art document which disclosed hydrogenation reactions using supercritical carbon dioxide and a noble metal catalyst. This prior art document disclosed the use of the process to hydrogenate a range of organic compounds. None of these disclosed compounds were hop acids although it was argued by Thomas Swan that some were sufficiently similar. Nevertheless the hearing officer held that these similarities were not sufficient to render the claims of the patent invalid through lack of inventive step and refused the application for revocation.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o14604.html