BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Secretary of State for Defence v Farrow System Ltd (Patent) [2005] UKIntelP o30805 (23 November 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o30805.html
Cite as: [2005] UKIntelP o30805

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Secretary of State for Defence v Farrow System Ltd [2005] UKIntelP o30805 (23 November 2005)

For the whole decision click here: o30805

Patent decision

BL number
O/308/05
Concerning rights in
GB 2344348 and GB 2372039
Hearing Officer
Mr P Back
Decision date
23 November 2005
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Secretary of State for Defence v Farrow System Ltd
Provisions discussed
PA.1977 Section 72 (1)
Keywords
Revocation
Related Decisions
[2005] UKIntelP o00805

Summary

The Claimant submitted amended statements of case with its evidence-in-chief, the amended statements introducing two allegations of prior use. The Defendant objected to the admission of the amended statements in view of the lateness of the amendments and the difficulty in dealing with the prior use grounds. The Hearing Officer was satisfied that the new grounds had became apparent only during collation of the Claimants evidence and found no undue delay or lack of diligence. The public interest would not be served by refusing the amendments. It was accepted that there would inevitably be some detriment to the Defendant in that it would be obliged to respond to the amended grounds, but weighing all the factors the balance went to allowing the amendments. An order for costs was made in favour of the Defendant to compensate for the extra work involved in dealing with the amended statements of case.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o30805.html