BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> YOUNG BOND (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2005] UKIntelP o31505 (1 December 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o31505.html
Cite as: [2005] UKIntelP o31505

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


YOUNG BOND (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2005] UKIntelP o31505 (1 December 2005)

For the whole decision click here: o31505

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/315/05
Decision date
1 December 2005
Hearing officer
Mr C Bowen
Mark
YOUNG BOND
Classes
09, 16, 25, 28, 38, 41
Applicant
Ian Fleming Publications Limited
Opponent
Danjaq LLC
Interlocutory hearing in relation to Opposition proceedings brought under Sections 5(2)(b), 5(3) & 5(4)(a)

Result

Extension of time granted. -

Points Of Interest

Summary

Following the filing of notice of opposition and counterstatement the Registry had issued a Preliminary Indication, notifying the opponent that the opposition under Section 5(2)(b) was likely to fail, but allowed a month for the filing of Form TM53 if they wished to proceed to the evidence stages. The opponent duly filed TM53 and was allowed a period of three months in which to file evidence-in-chief.

The opponent subsequently sought an extension of time and gave reasons for the request. The registry indicated their willingness to grant the extension but the applicant objected and a hearing was arranged. Following the hearing, at which the Registry had confirmed the extension, the applicant sought a written statement of the reasons for the Hearing Officer's decision.

BLO/315/05 sets out those reasons. The Hearing Officer made no order as to costs, as his decision to grant the extension was largely due to additional information provided at the hearing.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o31505.html