BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> James Anthony Powell (Patent) [2006] UKIntelP o27506 (27 September 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o27506.html
Cite as: [2006] UKIntelP o27506

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


James Anthony Powell [2006] UKIntelP o27506 (27 September 2006)

For the whole decision click here: o27506

Patent decision

BL number
O/275/06
Concerning rights in
GB 0207203.1
Hearing Officer
Mrs S E Chalmers
Decision date
27 September 2006
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
James Anthony Powell
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 Sections 1(1)(a), 1(1)(c) 14(3)
Keywords
Industrial application, Novelty, Sufficiency
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The application relates to sea bed food producing habitats. Scrap iron or steel submerged underwater is alleged to release a new form of energy from the metal to enable a reaction between the water and carbon dioxide to produce carbohydrates, which can be used as foodstuff for aquatic life. Objection was raised that the application was incapable of industrial application, that the invention lacked novelty, and that its disclosure was neither clear nor complete enough for the invention to be repeated. The hearing officer held that the application would contravene the laws of physics since it effectively claimed the creation of energy from nothing. She also found the invention to lack novelty, and to have insufficient disclosure for the invention to be repeated by a person skilled in the art. She therefore refused the application for not having an industrial application, lacking novelty and insufficiency.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o27506.html