BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> GMC Tools (UK) Ltd v Makita Corporation (Patent) [2007] UKIntelP o12107 (9 May 2007)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o12107.html
Cite as: [2007] UKIntelP o12107

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


GMC Tools (UK) Ltd v Makita Corporation [2007] UKIntelP o12107 (9 May 2007)

For the whole decision click here: o12107

Patent decision

BL number
O/121/07
Concerning rights in
EP(UK) 0570903
Hearing Officer
Mr P Hayward
Decision date
9 May 2007
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
GMC Tools (UK) Ltd v Makita Corporation
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 section 117
Keywords
Correction, Stay of proceedings
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The patent was subject to a revocation action in the Patents County Court, due to come to trial in just under 4 weeks. The proprietors (Makita) sought to correct an alleged mistake and were anxious for this to be resolved before the trial of the revocation action. The applicants for revocation, GMC, opposed the request and asked for the correction proceedings to be stayed until the revocation action had been disposed of.

The hearing officer rejected GMC’s argument that the issues in the revocation and correction actions overlapped and felt that the chances of unnecessary duplication and/or inconsistent conclusions were small. Nevertheless, he was concerned that it would not be possible to dispose of the correction request before the trial of the revocation action without riding roughshod over GMC’s rights, and felt that failure to complete the correction action before the trial would have only a limited effect on the revocation action. As it was possible that the revocation action would effectively dispose of the correction action, he concluded that the balance lay in favour of granting a stay.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o12107.html