BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> James Campbell v Aberdeen University (Patent) [2007] UKIntelP o26907 (13 September 2007) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o26907.html Cite as: [2007] UKIntelP o26907 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o26907
Summary
After the counterstatement was filed in these entitlement proceedings, the Hearing Officer directed that the parties attend a case management conference (CMC) in order for him to give directions with regard to the future management of these proceedings. The directions are concerned with focusing the statement and counterstatement on the issue(s) at stake, setting a timetable for the proceedings (eg. evidence rounds) and considering ADR (eg. mediation).
