BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> F- Secure Oyj (Patent) [2009] UKIntelP o17409 (23 June 2009)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2009/o17409.html
Cite as: [2009] UKIntelP o17409

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


F- Secure Oyj [2009] UKIntelP o17409 (23 June 2009)

For the whole decision click here: o17409

Patent decision

BL number
O/174/09
Concerning rights in
GB 0604165.1
Hearing Officer
Mrs C L Davies
Decision date
23 June 2009
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
F- Secure Oyj
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 sections 1(1)(b), 1(2) (c) and 14(5)(d)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused), Inventive step, Plurality of invention
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention relates to a method of loading an anti-virus application or malware removal program onto a mobile communications device from a memory card using a Symbian recognizer during the boot sequence. The hearing officer applied the four step test set out in Windurfing as amended by Pozzolli and held that the application did not make an Inventive step in the light of the patent citations and documents identified on the Internet. Specifically, the hearing officer found that the internet citations formed part of the common general knowledge of the skilled programmer who would as a matter of course search the Internet for a solution when faced with a programming problem.

The hearing officer also found that the application was excluded as a computer program. Applying the Aerotel test in the light of Symbian, the hearing officer held that the contribution was the loading of a virus checker during the boot sequence. Having established that a recogniser was a component part of the Symbian Operating system and ran during the booting sequence the hearing officer found that the only contribution was in the choice of the application being run. The hearing officer further considered whether there was a technical contribution present and having decided there was not, refused the application.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2009/o17409.html