BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Martin Anthony Mckenzie (Patent) [2010] UKIntelP o30910 (31 August 2010)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2010/o30910.html
Cite as: [2010] UKIntelP o30910

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Martin Anthony Mckenzie [2010] UKIntelP o30910 (31 August 2010)

For the whole decision click here: o30910

Patent decision

BL number
O/309/10
Concerning rights in
GB 0604646.9
Hearing Officer
Miss Ceri Witchard
Decision date
31 August 2010
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Martin Anthony Mckenzie
Provisions discussed
Patents Act Section 76
Keywords
Added subject matter, Section 20 period
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The application relates to an improvement to shutters that are used to close up businesses and shops overnight. The invention is aimed at making them more attractive by incorporating lighting or illumination effects. The applicant sought to amend the patent to include claims to shutters incorporating video surveillance equipment, integrated security equipment and shield adaptations. The hearing officer considered the application as filed and as amended and found that the proposed amendments added subject matter. The original specification mentioned the terms the applicant was seeking to include only briefly and in a particular context. The amended claims disclosed an arrangement that was not disclosed in the original specification and therefore contravened section 76. The period for putting the application in order has expired. The hearing officer therefore refused the application.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2010/o30910.html