BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Berni Hambleton v Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o11812 (15 March 2012) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o11812.html Cite as: [2012] UKIntelP o11812 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Summary
The defendants in this case objected to the admissibility of the claimant’s evidence-in-reply on the grounds that it was not strictly in reply, and could have been filed at an earlier stage in the proceedings. The Hearing Officer found the evidence to be admissible but allowed the defendant an opportunity to file additional submissions in response.
