BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Susan Grant v Teifion Emlyn James (Patent) [2014] UKIntelP o22414 (22 May 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2014/o22414.html Cite as: [2014] UKIntelP o22414 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Summary
A request to amend the defendant’s counterstatement was opposed by the claimants. The hearing officer exercised his discretion in line with the overriding principle to deal with the case justly and allowed the amendment.