BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Sergei Aleksandrovich Korotkov (Patent) [2023] UKIntelP o003423 (13 January 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2023/o003423.html
Cite as: [2023] UKIntelP o3423, [2023] UKIntelP o003423

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Patent decision

BL number
O/0034/23
Concerning rights in
GB1813098.9
Hearing Officer
Mr S Brown
Decision date
13 January 2023
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Sergei Aleksandrovich Korotkov
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 Sections 14(3), 1(1)(a) and 1(1)(b)
Keywords
Inventive step, Novelty, Sufficiency
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The application concerns a container for heating water, such as a -tea kettle-. The container includes two chambers selectively divided from each other by a partition. When the partition is open heating the bottom part of the container boils the water in both chambers. If only a small amount of hot water is required, the partition is closed and water in the upper chamber receives less heat thereby reducing energy consumption.

1 The Hearing Officer considered two claim sets - one as amended on 31 May 2022, the second as filed, after the compliance date, on 1 August 2022, the examiner having refused the accompanying F52.

The Hearing Officer considered sufficiency and applied thePozzolitest and decided that the application on file on 31 July 2022 lacked sufficiency due to excessive claim breadth and further that the first claim set lacked the required inventive step. He further decided that while the application on file on 1 August 2022 was sufficient the second claim set still lacked the required inventive step. He therefore declined to decide whether discretion should be exercised to allow the last F52. The application was refused under section 18(3).

Full decisionO/0034/23 PDF document 398Kb


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2023/o003423.html