BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Carmichael and Sefton BC (HB) (Housing and council tax benefits - rent restrictions) [2017] UKUT 174 (AAC) (27 April 2017) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/174.html Cite as: [2017] UKUT 174 (AAC) |
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Carmichael and Sefton BC (HB) (Housing and council tax benefits - rent restrictions) [2017] UKUT 174 (AAC) (27 April 2017)
Regulation B13 (‘bedroom tax’ or ’spare room subsidy’) - claimant and disabled wife unable to share same bedroom owing to wife’s disability needs; FTT should have directed local authority to calculate the claimant’s housing benefit entitlement without making a deduction of 14% for under occupancy (to avoid an unlawful breach of Mr & Mrs Carmichael’s ECHR art 14 rights (following R (Carmichael and Rourke) (formerly MA and others) v SSWP [2016] UKSC 58.
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 174.pdf