BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Crossland v Information Commissioner and Leeds City Council (Information rights, Tribunal procedure and practice) [2020] UKUT 260 (AAC) (26 August 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/260.html
Cite as: [2020] UKUT 260 (AAC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Crossland v Information Commissioner and Leeds City Council [2020] UKUT 260 (AAC) (26 August 2020)


The Appellant, who had appealed to the FTT (General Regulatory Chamber) against the Information Commissioner's decision notice, appealed to the Upper Tribunal, principally on the basis that the FTT hearing was unfair. The alleged unfairness comprised (1) a refusal to adjourn the hearing to allow the Appellant more time to prepare for the hearing; (2) a refusal to permit the Appellant to make all the legal arguments he wished to make; and (3) unfairness to the Appellant as a litigant in person in the FTT's conduct of the hearing. Having considered transcripts of the hearing, the Upper Tribunal dismissed the appeal. The Upper Tribunal Judge also refused a recusal application made by the Appellant.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 260 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/260.html