BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Crossland v Information Commissioner (Information rights, Recusal, Strike Out and Excluded Decisions : Judicial Review)[2020] UKUT 264 (AAC) (23 June 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/264.html
Cite as: [2020] UKUT 264 (AAC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Crossland v Information Commissioner (Recusal, Strike Out and Excluded Decisions (Judicial Review)) [2020] UKUT 264 (AAC) (23 June 2020)


Information rights - application to Upper Tribunal for permission to appeal from First-tier Tribunal interlocutory case management directions - whether UT Judge should recuse himself from determining application - whether application should be struck out for want of jurisdiction or for no reasonable prospects of success - whether recusal and strike out rulings are ‘excluded decisions’ under TCEA 2007 section 13(8)(c) and so subject to challenge only by way of judicial review or alternatively by application for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 264 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/264.html