BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Robert Rummey Associates v Customs & Excise [2003] UKVAT V18304 (08 September 2003) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2003/V18304.html Cite as: [2003] UKVAT V18304 |
||
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
Robert Rummey Associates v Customs & Excise [2003] UKVAT V18304 (08 September 2003)
LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE
Reference No: LON/03/537
ROBERT RUMMEY ASSOCIATES Appellant
- and -
THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents
Tribunal: MR M TILDESLEY (Chairman)
Sitting in public in London on 27 August 2003
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
AND UPON HEARING Mr Robert Rummey on behalf of the Appellant and Mr Clive Palmart on behalf of the Respondents
AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representatives stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules
THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT there is no reasonable excuse
AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is DISMISSED
The Tribunal recommends to the Commissioners that the Appellant be allowed time to pay the surcharge
AND that there is to be no direction as to costs
M TILDESLEY
Chairman
Release Date:
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2003
