BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Pat Caulfield (Bootham) Ltd v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18819 (22 October 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18819.html
Cite as: [2004] UKVAT V18819

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

Pat Caulfield (Bootham) Ltd v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18819 (22 October 2004)

     
    18819

    MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/2004/0267

    PAT CAULFIELD (BOOTHAM) LIMITED Appellant

    and

    THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents

    Tribunal: Mr I E Vellins (Chairman)

    Sitting in public in York on the 27 September 2004

    DIRECTION
    under Rule 30(8)

    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to surcharge assessments dated 15 November 2002, 12 September 2003 and 12 December 2003 in the sums of £580.48, £1567.87 and £452.29 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 (as amended) coming on for hearing this day

    And upon hearing Mrs S Williamson for the Appellant and Mr B Haley of the Solicitor's office of HM Customs and Excise for the Respondents

    And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    This tribunal finds that the Appellant does have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal dated 15 November 2002 but that the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for the other 2 defaults. And this tribunal directs that this appeal is allowed in part and dismissed in part. And that there is to be no direction as to costs

    MR I E VELLINS
    CHAIRMAN
    Release Date: 22 October 2004

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18819.html