BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Crossley v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19620 (09 June 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19620.html
Cite as: [2006] UKVAT V19620

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


    Crossley v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19620 (09 June 2006)

    19620
    MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/06/0157
    ROBERT DAVID CROSSLEY Appellant
    and
    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR
    HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
    Tribunal Chairman: Jean Warburton
    Sitting in public in Manchester on the 1 June 2006
    DIRECTION
    under Rule 30(8)

    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to five surcharge assessments dated the 18 May 2005, 9 January 2006, 9 January 2006, 9 January 2006 and 24 February 2006 in the sums of £201.29, £342.66, £302.52, £298.23 and £514.27 and being reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    And upon hearing the Appellant in person and Mrs F Clements of Solicitor's office for HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents

    And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    This tribunal finds that the Appellant does have reasonable excuses for all five of the defaults which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal

    And this tribunal directs that this appeal is allowed

    And that there is to be no direction as to costs

    JEAN WARBURTON
    CHAIRMAN
    Release Date: 9 June 2006
    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19620.html