BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Dougherty v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19759 (11 September 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19759.html
Cite as: [2006] UKVAT V19759

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Anthony Mark Dougherty v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19759 (11 September 2006)

     

    19759

    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/06/359

    Copy sent to:

    Appellant/Applicant

    Respondents

    ANTHONY MARK DOUGHERTY Appellant

    - and -

    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S

    REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal: JOHN F AVERY JONES CBE (Chairman)

    R S SURI

    Sitting in public in London on 6 September 2006

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    AND UPON HEARING Mr J Holl for the Respondents the Appellant not being present or represented

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal under Rule 26(2) and having announced its decision

    AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representative(s) stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for the misdeclaration and the Tribunal does not propose any mitigation of the penalty

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is DISMISSED

    As the hearing was in the absence of the Appellant the Appellant has 14 days from the date of release of this direction to apply for the appeal to be reinstated giving full reasons for his failure to attend.

    AND that there is to be no direction as to costs

    John F Avery Jones

    Chairman

    Release Date: 11 September 2006

    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19759.html