BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Media Icon Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2008] UKVAT V20794 (03 September 2008) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2008/V20794.html Cite as: [2008] UKVAT V20794 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
20794
LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2008/0801
Copy sent to
Appellant Respondents
MEDIA ICON LIMITED
Appellant
- and -
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S
REVENUE AHD CUSTOMS
Respondents
Tribunal : DR A N BRICE (Chairman)
MR J N BROWN CBE FCA
Sitting in public in London on 3 September 2008
DIRECTION
Under Rule 30(8)
THIS was an appeal against a default surcharge for the accounting period ending on 30 November 2007; the return and tax were due on 31 December 2007 and the return was received on 24 December 2007 although the tax was not received until 25 January 2008.
WE HEARD Mr Paul Bushell for the Appellant and Mrs Pauline Crinnion for the Respondents
WE FIND THAT Mr Bushell, as director, signed the cheque for the payment of the tax on 20 December 2007 before departing for holiday. Howwever, the return was not then ready for signature and Mr Bushell asked another director, Mr Pawson, to sign the return when it was ready and to counter-sign the cheque and to send them both to the Respondents. Mr Pawson did sign the return and posted it in time but omitted to include the cheque
OUR DECISION IS that we were not satisfied that the Appellant had a reasonable excuse for not sending the tax in time
AT THE CONCLUSION of the appeal we announced our decision to dismiss the appeal and both parties present at the hearing agreed that they did not want a full written decision
WE THEREFORE DIRECT that the appeal be dismissed
DR A N BRICE
Chairman
Release Date: 3 September 2008
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2008