Editorial
| Editorial | |
| Stephen Mason, Allison Stanfield | i-iii |
Articles
| A proposed electronic evidence exchange across the European Union | |
| Maria Angela Biasiotti | 1-12 |
| Another method of stealing cash from ATMs | |
| Timothy Tion | 13-15 |
| Establishing possession, custody and control through electronic baggage tags | |
| Gita Radhakrishna | 16-21 |
| ‘Mobile Ping Data’ – Metadata for Tracking | |
| Reg Coutts, Hugh Selby | 22-25 |
| Forced biometric authentication – on a recent amendment in the Norwegian Code of Criminal Procedure | |
| Ingvild Bruce | 26-30 |
| The Garlasco case and the digital alibi evidence: a difficult relationship between law and informatics | |
| Eleonora Colombo | 31-38 |
| Network investigative source codes and due process | |
| Brian L. Owsley | 39-46 |
| The enforceability of electronic arbitration agreements before the DIFC Courts and Dubai Courts | |
| Omar Husain Qouteshat, Kamal Jamal Alawamleh | 47-60 |
Undergraduate essay
| The role of digital signatures in the digitisation of loan documentation in India | |
| Rishabh Sant Tiwari, Deepansh Goyal | 61-66 |
Case Ruling
| Case Ruling: England & Wales - R v Cahill; R v Pugh 14 October 2014 | |
| England & Wales Case Ruling: | 67-71 |
Case Translations
| Case translation: Estonia | |
| Estonia Case Translations: | 72-78 |
| Case translation: Spain | |
| Spain Case Translations: | 79-87 |
Book Reports
| Book Reports | |
| Book Reports | 88-103 |
Research
| PhD Research | |
| PhD Research | 104-115 |
Credits
| General Editors and Editorial Board | |
| Volume 14 Credits | 116-118 |
ISSN 2054-8508 (Online) (c) 2019 Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review
This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.